Home » Dividend Growth Stocks » Dividend Contenders » Starbucks versus Nike: Dividend Growth Comparison
Starbucks versus Nike

Starbucks versus Nike: Dividend Growth Comparison

Dividend growth investors must often decide which stock to purchase with new money. This holds true whether starting a new position or adding to an existing position. This decision is not always straightforward. But dividend growth investors should at least take a look at dividend safety and valuation. In this analysis, I make a head-to-head comparison of Starbucks Corporation NASDAQ:SBUX and Nike Inc NYSE:NKE, two very popular growth stocks that also pay a rising dividend.

Overview of Starbucks

Starbucks traces its history to one store in Seattle in 1971. Today, Starbucks operates around 31,256 stores globally (at the end of Q4 FY2019). The company’s business model is focused on selling coffee at company-operated stores (80% of revenue). But it also has licensed stores (~11% of revenue) and sells products through licensing of its brand (~9% of revenue). The company sells coffee, teas, cold-blended beverages, food, and other items at its stores. Starbucks also sells coffee, tea, and food at its own stores and grocery stores and warehouse clubs through its Global Coffee Alliance with Nestle S.A. (NSRGY). It also sells bottled beverages, ice creams, and other items in partnership with PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) and other companies. Although Starbucks operates globally, the Americas provide the most revenue at 69% of total revenue, 20% of total revenue is from China/Asia-Pacific, and 11% of total revenue is from EMEA. Starbucks is considered one of the top 100 brands in the world at No. 48 by Interbrand.

Overview of Nike

Nike was founded in 1964 in Oregon. The company designs, develops, markets, and sells athletic footwear, apparel, equipment, and accessories worldwide. Nike’s main brands include Nike, Jordan, Converse, and Hurley. Nike is a global powerhouse and is the largest athletic footwear and apparel company in the world. The company ships products to more than 30,000 retailers in more than 190 countries. Nike operates 1,200 stores (one-third in the U.S.) and has another ~6,000 franchised stores globally. Nike is considered one of the top 100 brands in the world at No. 16 by Interbrand. The company maintains its brand strength through continuous endorsements of top athletes and teams.

Dividend Safety Comparison for Starbucks and Nike

Both Starbucks and Nike pay a growing dividend. Starbucks is a Dividend Contender having now raised the dividend for 10 consecutive years. The forward yield is ~1.9% and is currently safe based on earnings, free cash flow, and debt as seen in the chart below based on data from TIKR.com*. The current forward payout ratio is approximately 53.8% based on a dividend of $1.64 per share and consensus 2020 earnings per share of $3.05. This is a good ratio and below my threshold of 65%. From the perspective of free cash flow, operating cash flow was $5,047 million in fiscal 2019 and capital expenditures were $1,807 million giving free cash flow of $3,240 million. The dividend required about $1,761M giving a dividend-to-FCF ratio of ~54.4%. This is a good value and below my criteria of 70%. I also do not find total debt to be worrisome from the perspective of dividend safety. At the end of Q4 FY2019, the company had no short-term debt and $11,169.6 million in long-term debt offset by $2,757.1 million in cash, cash equivalents, and investments. The company’s leverage ratio is ~1.6X and interest coverage is ~12X, meaning that Starbucks can pay its obligations.

Nike is also a Dividend Contender have raised the dividend for 18 consecutive years. The forward yield is ~0.96%. The dividend has excellent safety based on earnings, free cash flow, and debt. The forward payout ratio is approximately 32.4% based on a dividend of $0.98 per share and consensus 2020 earnings per share of $3.02. This is an excellent value from the perspective of dividend safety and well within my threshold of 65%. From the perspective of free cash flow, operating cash flow was $5,903 million in fiscal 2019 and capital expenditures were $1,119 million giving free cash flow of $4,784 million. The dividend required about $1,332 million giving a dividend-to-FCF ratio of 27.8%. This is an excellent value and well below my criteria of 70%. Debt is almost a non-issue for Nike. At the end of Q2 FY2020, the company had only $306 million in short-term debt and $3,462 million in long-term debt offset by $3,502 million in cash, cash equivalents, and investments. The company’s leverage ratio is ~0.6X and interest coverage is over 100X, meaning that Nike’s balance sheet is very conservative.

Selected Dividend Growth and Safety Metrics

CompanyDividend YieldYears of Div. GrowthPayout RatioDividend to FCF Ratio
Starbucks1.9%1053.8%54.4%
Nike0.96%1832.4%27.8%
Source: Dividend Power based on data from Seeking Alpha and TIKR.com*

Valuation Comparison for Starbucks and Nike

The main concern in making an investment in Starbucks or Nike at this juncture is valuation. Starbucks is trading at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of ~28.9 based on consensus fiscal 2020 earnings of $3.05. Nike is trading at an even higher price-to-earnings ratio of ~33.6 based on consensus fiscal 2020 earnings of $3.02. Both stocks are trading at high valuations based on earnings multiples relative to historical valuations and the broader market. The current average P/E ratio for the S&P 500 is ~24.3. This is higher than the trailing mean of ~15.8 and median of ~14.8. Starbucks trailing 10-year earnings multiple is roughly 26.0 and that of Nike is about 23.0. At current stock prices, the valuations of both stocks exceed the trailing multiples. The risk from such high multiples is that they revert to the mean. But with that said both companies are growing the top and bottom lines rapidly right now.

Final Thoughts on Starbucks and Nike

Nike’s valuation is currently sky high at over 30 times earnings and trading near its 52-week and all-time high. On the other hand, Starbucks is trading at about 10% below its 52-week and all-time high. For investors looking to start a new position I would wait for a better entry point. For existing shareholders, Starbucks has the lower valuation and higher yield at the moment. Hence, it is a better candidate for adding to an existing position.

Disclosure: I am long NKE and SBUX.

This article was first posted as Guest Post by Dividend Power on the Dividend Earner blog on January 7, 2020.


Here are my recommendations:

If you are unsure on how to invest in dividend stocks or are just getting started with dividend investing. Take a look at my Review of the Simply Investing Report. I also provide a Review of the Simply Investing Course. Note that I am an affiliate of Simply Investing.

If you are interested in an excellent resource for DIY dividend growth investors. I suggest reading my Review of The Sure Dividend NewsletterNote that I am an affiliate of Sure Dividend.

If you want to simplify your portfolio management and stop using spreadsheets take a look at my article on Passiv – A Modern Portfolio Management Website ReviewNote that I an affiliate of Passiv.

If you would like notifications as to when my new articles are published, please sign up for my free weekly e-mail. You will receive a free spreadsheet of the Dividend Kings! You will also join thousands of other readers each month!


*This post contains affiliate links meaning that I earn a commission for any purchases that you make at the Affiliates website through these links. This will not incur additional costs for you. Please read my disclosure for more information.

Website | + posts

Prakash Kolli is the founder of the Dividend Power site. He is a self-taught investor, analyst, and writer on dividend growth stocks and financial independence. His writings can be found on Seeking Alpha, InvestorPlace, Business Insider, Nasdaq, TalkMarkets, ValueWalk, The Money Show, Forbes, Yahoo Finance, and leading financial sites. In addition, he is part of the Portfolio Insight and Sure Dividend teams. He was recently in the top 1.0% and 100 (73 out of over 13,450) financial bloggers, as tracked by TipRanks (an independent analyst tracking site) for his articles on Seeking Alpha.

Related Posts

Leave a Reply